Skip to content

Notion 'Retrieve Block' summary fix #16325

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 16, 2025
Merged

Notion 'Retrieve Block' summary fix #16325

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 16, 2025

Conversation

@GTFalcao
Copy link
Collaborator

@GTFalcao GTFalcao commented Apr 16, 2025 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

Addresses the issue reported in #16214

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Improved internal logic for determining when to retrieve children blocks, resulting in cleaner and more maintainable code.
  • Chores
    • Updated version numbers for the Notion action and package.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Apr 16, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

3 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
docs-v2 ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Apr 16, 2025 9:47pm
pipedream-docs ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Apr 16, 2025 9:47pm
pipedream-docs-redirect-do-not-edit ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Apr 16, 2025 9:47pm

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 16, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Walkthrough

This update increments the version numbers for both the Notion retrieve-block action and its package. In the retrieve-block action, the conditional logic for determining whether to retrieve children blocks was refactored for clarity by introducing a boolean variable. The summary export message was also updated to use this new variable. No changes were made to the core retrieval logic or error handling.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
components/notion/actions/retrieve-block/retrieve-block.mjs Refactored logic for retrieving children blocks into a boolean variable; updated version to 0.2.1; updated summary export message.
components/notion/package.json Incremented package version from 0.6.0 to 0.6.1.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • dannyroosevelt

Poem

A version hop, a logic tweak,
The children blocks now easier to seek.
With booleans clear and numbers new,
The Notion rabbit hops right through.
🐇✨
Code refactored, neat and bright—
Another update done just right!

Warning

There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure.

🔧 ESLint

If the error stems from missing dependencies, add them to the package.json file. For unrecoverable errors (e.g., due to private dependencies), disable the tool in the CodeRabbit configuration.

components/notion/actions/retrieve-block/retrieve-block.mjs

Oops! Something went wrong! :(

ESLint: 8.57.1

Error [ERR_MODULE_NOT_FOUND]: Cannot find package 'jsonc-eslint-parser' imported from /eslint.config.mjs
at packageResolve (node:internal/modules/esm/resolve:839:9)
at moduleResolve (node:internal/modules/esm/resolve:908:18)
at defaultResolve (node:internal/modules/esm/resolve:1038:11)
at ModuleLoader.defaultResolve (node:internal/modules/esm/loader:557:12)
at ModuleLoader.resolve (node:internal/modules/esm/loader:525:25)
at ModuleLoader.getModuleJob (node:internal/modules/esm/loader:246:38)
at ModuleJob._link (node:internal/modules/esm/module_job:126:49)

Tip

⚡💬 Agentic Chat (Pro Plan, General Availability)
  • We're introducing multi-step agentic chat in review comments and issue comments, within and outside of PR's. This feature enhances review and issue discussions with the CodeRabbit agentic chat by enabling advanced interactions, including the ability to create pull requests directly from comments and add commits to existing pull requests.
📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 435555b and 7fcf022.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • components/notion/actions/retrieve-block/retrieve-block.mjs (2 hunks)
  • components/notion/package.json (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: Publish TypeScript components
  • GitHub Check: pnpm publish
  • GitHub Check: Verify TypeScript components
🔇 Additional comments (4)
components/notion/package.json (1)

3-3: Version increment confirmed.

This patch version increment (0.6.0 → 0.6.1) aligns with the minor refactoring changes made in the retrieve-block action.

components/notion/actions/retrieve-block/retrieve-block.mjs (3)

7-7: Version increment aligned with package.

The action version update from 0.2.0 to 0.2.1 appropriately reflects the minor refactoring changes and aligns with the package version increment.

45-50: Good refactoring for improved readability.

The introduction of the shouldRetrieveChildren boolean variable improves code readability by clearly expressing the condition for retrieving children blocks, which was previously implied in the if statement. This makes the logic more explicit and easier to understand.

53-53: Consistent use of refactored variable.

The summary export message now uses the same shouldRetrieveChildren variable, ensuring consistency with the retrieval logic and making the code more maintainable.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

michelle0927
michelle0927 approved these changes Apr 16, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Collaborator

@michelle0927 michelle0927 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@GTFalcao GTFalcao merged commit c847bb7 into master Apr 16, 2025
11 checks passed
@GTFalcao GTFalcao deleted the notion-followup-summary-fix branch April 16, 2025 22:00
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Apr 17, 2025
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@michelle0927 michelle0927 michelle0927 approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@GTFalcao @michelle0927